↓
 

William A. Ruskin's Toxic Tort Litigtion Blog

News, Analysis, and Trends

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • LAW PRACTICE

Category Archives: Climate Change Litigation

Major U.S. Government Report Acknowledges That People Cause Climate Change

William A. Ruskin's Toxic Tort Litigtion Blog Posted on November 3, 2017 by William A. RuskinNovember 3, 2017

On November 3, 2017, the United States issued an exhaustive scientific report, titled the “Climate Science Special Report”, which acknowledges that human activity is a major cause of the temperature rise that has occurred over the past century.  The climate science report is part of a Congressionally mandated review that occurs every four years known as the National Climate Assessment.  The National Climate Assessment represents the findings and analyses of hundreds of experts and scientists from federal agencies, national laboratories, universities, and the private sector. The final work product was peer reviewed by the National Academy of Sciences. The National Oceanic and … Continue reading →

Posted in Climate Change Litigation | Tagged Christopher Field, clean energy, climate change, Department of Defense, global warming, National Climate Assessment, Paris accord, Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, U.S. Army | Leave a reply

Defending Ecosystem Damage Claims: A Primer

William A. Ruskin's Toxic Tort Litigtion Blog Posted on November 2, 2017 by William A. RuskinNovember 2, 2017

Claims alleging natural resource or ecological damage are on the rise, but the standards governing the performance of ecological risk assessments are  not nearly as developed as the standards used for evaluating human health risks.  Consequently, the legal defenses to natural resource or ecological damage claims are not as well-developed as the defenses to claims of risk to human health.   Fortunately for the environmental defense bar, Carol M. Wood, a partner at King & Spalding; Judi L. Durda, a vice-president and toxicologist/ecologist at Integral Consulting; and Stephen Rahaim, chief environmental counsel at E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company, have written an excellent primer for navigating through … Continue reading →

Posted in Climate Change Litigation, Public Nuisance | Tagged Carol M. Wood, causation, DRI, ecological damage claims, Judi L. Durda, lack of duty, natural resource damages, Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co, Peter Hayes, Stephen Rahaim, When the Exposed are Bugs and Bunnies | Leave a reply

Climate Change, Ecosystem Damage Claims and the Radicalization of the Court System

William A. Ruskin's Toxic Tort Litigtion Blog Posted on October 26, 2017 by William A. RuskinOctober 26, 2017

The use of the court system to address what is at its root  a political and social problem is not only misguided, but dangerous. I have discussed in prior articles the danger implicit in using public nuisance law to effect political change. California plaintiffs in the current climate change litigation are effectively blaming a handful of large industrial concerns for the evolution of our present-day civilization when the blame, if blame is even the appropriate term, should be collectively shared by countless other “responsible” parties.  At a time when USEPA is scrubbing from its website any and all references to climate change or global … Continue reading →

Posted in Climate Change Litigation, Public Nuisance | Tagged Barbara Parker, Big Tobacco, Chevron, climate change litigation, Exxon, failure-to-warn, Fossil Majors, greenhouse gases, Imperial Beach, Marin, Massachusetts v. EPA, NASA, Oakland, public nuisance, San Francisco, San Mateo, Shell | 1 Reply

William A. Ruskin

The Toxic Tort Litigation Blog reports on recent developments and trends in toxic tort, environmental and product liability litigation of interest to the defense bar.  It also explores the convergence of complex science and medicine and the law.
Learn more >>

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS

RSS feed RSS - Posts

Recent Posts

  • The Corrupting Impact of Plaintiff Litigation Advertising
  • Why Anchoring Is Effective In Generating Excessive Jury Verdicts
  • New York’s High Court Expands Definition of Family
  • New York State Court Leads U.S. In Spoliation Of Evidence Risk
  • How Amended Federal Rule 30(b)(6) Will Change Your Practice

Categories

  • Asbestos
  • Causation
  • CERCLA
  • Class Action
  • Climate Change Litigation
  • Daubert
  • Discovery
  • Emotional Distress
  • Environmental Advocacy
  • Expert Testimony
  • Federal Court Litigation
  • General Causation
  • GMOs
  • Local Counsel
  • Mediation
  • Multidistrict Litigation
  • New York Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Product Liability
  • Public Nuisance
  • Remote Depositions
  • Social Media
  • Specific Causation
  • Uncategorized
  • Value Assurance Plan
  • Zone of Danger
© 2017 William A. Ruskin - Weaver Xtreme Theme
↑
 

Loading Comments...